Ok, I guess you could call that a dragon.
I agree with this because Dinosaur Bones were believed to be a dragonâs bones so they were ground down into powder and used for medicine. Also back then Dino Bones wouldnât have been buried as deep as they are now making them easier to find.
Why would they not have been buried as deep? It wasnât that long ago, relatively speaking. Dinosaur extinction ~65.5MYA, human history a little over 100,000 years or so. Much shorter for the cultures that actually came up with dragons I imagine. I donât think it would have made that much of a difference.
Other than that, thanks for agreeing with me
Old ruins from back then are still a ways under. Quite a few stratas of mud and dirt would be gone
Well, okay, but if it was a linear thing it would still only be (probably much less than) 1/65th the difference. Itâs probably not linear, and probably itâs just that sometimes even older layers happen to be closer to the surface (and vice versa, explaining the ruins being buried a ways), but I think the time between now and the time of the âinventionâ of dragons would not be very important.
All hail the mighty and great wombat master race, precursor to the Stonehearthians!
(Iâll get a picture up later. On mobile now!)
@Swift_Cube Wombats are cool too.
its 100% hedgehogs just look at them and melt.
Really animals are just fantastic regardless.
I hate that picture to the point of using it for target practice with my BB Guns.
If you take a fish out of water, of course it will look strange.
And what a beauty it is
You canât deny your picture was highly misleading. The second picture looks MUCH more attractive than the first.
Maybe, I just used the first picture google spouted out
Any more work for blob would have been troublesome
Gawd. That would would be perfect in a horror movie.
Nuffâ Said.
You sure thatâs a blob fish? Kinda looks like Geoffers on a bad day.
So @Geoffers747 is always having a bad day? Explains why he is so grouchy all the timeâŚ
@Dwalus I too love the alpaca.